Showing posts with label Reference. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Reference. Show all posts
Nov 21, 2014
Oct 29, 2014
TERMS OF REFERENCE
Assessment of Implementation of the SNC “Guidelines for Risk Management & Accountability for NGOs operating in Somalia/Somaliland” (October 2014)
BACKGROUND:
NGO Consortium members have provided humanitarian and development assistance to communities in all regions of Somalia and Somaliland for decades. The operating environment in Somalia is highly challenging and complex, due to continuing conflict, lack of, weak or contested governance, high levels of criminality, and restricted humanitarian access to populations in need. For a long time, NGOs have encountered both security and operational challenges to their engagement in Somalia and yet have maintained their role of addressing the persistent needs of the communities they work with. In many areas, International NGOs have and continue to deliver assistance through their national partners or have resorted to remote management or third party monitoring of interventions.
NGO interventions have however been met with evidence of fraud, aid diversion and insufficient levels of accountability. This has put in question the levels of accountability that NGOs have to the vulnerable communities that they target in interventions and to their donors in terms of application of effective and efficient risk mitigation mechanisms. With the incremental improvements in access in parts of South Central Somalia over the last year as well as relative improvements in structures and systems for NGO engagement, focus on effective and accountable aid delivery in Somalia is increasing further. Many NGOs have invested significant resources including capacity into strengthening their internal risk management and accountability practices. This has not always been effectively communicated externally. Nor have many NGOs shared information with one another in an effort to approach the issue collectively.
In June 2014 the SNC commissioned a study on NGO approaches to risk management and accountability best practice in Somalia. As a result, members of the Consortium developed and endorsed the “Guidelines (Code of Conduct) for RMA practises for NGOs operating in Somalia / Somaliland”. They also committed to undertaking an assessment of the implementation of the risk management guidelines, with an objective to build momentum towards strengthening risk management approaches and fully implementing and striving towards best practice.
Definition of ‘risk’:
Programme implementation / project activities by necessity take place in ‘high-risk’ contexts; Somalia is a particularly acute example as it is affected by protracted armed conflict, recurring natural disasters and poor local governance. Risk can be understood as the possibility of ‘future harm’.Risk is broader than the possibility of aid being diverted before it reaches the designated beneficiaries, though this is evidently a central concern in South and Central Somalia. Risk is commonly categorised into three inter-connected types:
Contextual:factors which are external and often outside of humanitarians’ control;Programmatic:the risk of not meeting programme objectives, not meeting needs and potentially doing harm;Organisational:consequences for the security and safety of staff and for organisations’ reputations.DESCRIPTION OF THE ASSIGNMENT:
Objective:
The objective of this assessment is to map out and conduct an evidence based analysis of current NGO implementation of the aforementioned “Guidelines” at all levels of program implementation in Somalia. The goal of this initiative is to identify the effectiveness of the risk systems put in place by agencies and to build momentum to strengthen risk management approaches. This will allow Consortium members to not only promote accountability and transparency but also report on steps taken towards mitigating risk. Ultimately the aim is to improve the quality and effectiveness of risk management practice by agencies through increased accountability.
The commissioned assessment will assess evidence for:
1) implementation of the guidelines,
It will provide recommendations on:
2) good practices identified and / or instituted following lessons learnt through positive and negative implementation of practical risk mitigation;
3) a review and possible revision of the risk management guidelines.
The scope of the assessment will extend to agencies’ risk assessment steps / procedures, tools used and structures put in place to guide risk mitigation before programme interventions, as well as checks during programming and actions taken (if any) to manage incidents.
The overall assignment will be consultative and will make use of a mixture of qualitative methods of data collection, including semi-structured interviews, focus group discussions and workshops.
Activities to be carried out:
1) Preparatory work and desk review - 2 days
Initial desk review of process and documents leading up to the formulation and endorsement of the “Guidelines on risk mitigation for NGOs working in Somalia/Somaliland” and “Code of conduct and risk management”.Outline of planned report format, based on challenges and best practices as experienced by the agencies.Review of assessment methodology.Review of external approaches to risk mitigation monitoring.2) Interviews and study of internal agency documents - 10 days
Interviews with signed up NGOs to identify specific examples where the “implementation of the risk guidelines” are being met (a core target group of the 27 NGOs that have endorsed the guidelines) and tools usedInterview with CHF to see how this aligns with the CHF specific RMA approaches3) Report / Tool consolidation and write up - 3 days.
4) Develop/design and implement training on RMA structures and revision of Consortium risk management guidelines – 5 days.
Deliverables / Output:
A report on risk mitigation good practices as experienced by agencies operating in Somalia (what is viable -v- what is not). This report will detail progress against each of the 6 Code of Conduct areas without detailing individual agencies’ responses. Gaps will be identified and recommendations of where agencies should focus their effortsRevised draft risk management guidelines.Capacity Assessment Guide / Tool that can be used as a point of reference and check list by agencies operating in Somalia.Proposed benchmarks on implementation of the guidelines (where agencies are now and where they would ideally like to be in the future)Training plan on implementation and use of the capacity assessment guide / tool and at least one training executed with key stakeholders (SNC will support organisation of the event).REQUIREMENTS
Good understanding of Somalia (including power dynamics) and the operating conditions for NGOs providing assistance in SomaliaFamiliarity with Somalia NGO ConsortiumProven experience undertaking strategic evaluationsGood written and spoken English. Knowledge of Somali would be of added benefit.Please send to the Consortium director: director@somaliangoconsortium.org and in copy info@somaliangoconsortum.org by COB 4th November 2014
Cover letter on personal interest in evaluation and understanding of the ConsortiumMethodology and timetable for undertaking consultancyResumeStrategy paper/evaluation completed1 referenceThis post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.
Oct 27, 2014
1.Background
1.0.What is NSP?
The NGO Safety Program (NSP) for Somalia / Somaliland is a program developed by NGOs, with an aim to support International and National NGOs to operate safely and securely in Somalia / Somaliland.
NSP, initially called the NGO Security Preparedness and Support (NGO SPAS), was established in 2004 by NGOs operating in Somalia / Somaliland. One of the driving forces that gave rise to the program was the targeted killing of five aid workers between 2003 and 2004, and the realization that the operating environment for national and international NGOs was changing rapidly. Today, Somalia is considered as one of the most challenging context in terms of security for NGOs.
1.1.NSP is hosted by an INGO
NSP is a program, not an NGO with a legal entity. NSP is administratively and legally hosted by a volunteering NGO. This means accountancy, funds, and administrative issues (Human resources, contracts) are channeled through the hosting NGO. NSP is fully independent in terms of strategy and operational management, under the direction of a steering committee.
This particular organization ensures NSP remains a program by NGOs, for NGOs. A Similar structure has been adopted by other NGO safety Programs in the world, most noticeably the Afghanistan NGO Safety Office (ANSO), which initiated this model.
The current hosting NGO of NSP is the Danish Refugee Council (DRC). Previously NSP was hosted by Care international. NSP is closely linked with the NGO Consortium (same office, same Steering Committee).
1.2.Donors
NSP is funded by donors and favors a multi donor approach. Donors supporting NSP are the same donors supporting humanitarian actions in Somalia and Somaliland. The present Donors supporting NSP include:Common Humanitarian Fund for Somalia,ECHO, UK Aid / DFID, SDC
1.3.What are NSP Services?
NSP services are articulated around 4 pillars or results, for its current phase:
Result 1: NGOs operating in Somalia have improved their understanding of the Somali security context and can base their decisions on relevant and timely security information and analysis.
This is achieved through activities such as: Daily reports / Weekly reports and quarterly reports, Advisories, regular security briefings, production of Maps, Security Risk Assessments (SRA) etc…
Result 2: NGOs operating in Somalia have built up their capacity in terms of security knowledge and practices
This is achieved through activities such as Personal Security Training (HEIST, first aid training, Country Directors and Security Focal Point specific training etc….
Result 3: NGOs operating in Somalia are supported, on request, in terms of crisis management and evacuations
This is achieved through specific support tailored to the situation.
Result 4: Effective facilitation of SPU services is in place for NGOs operating in Puntland and Somaliland
This is achieved through activities such the follow-up and management of SPU requests, the provision of technical assistance in management of SPUs and the facilitation between different stakeholders (UNDP, NGOs, Local authorities)
2.The Purpose and Objectives of Evaluation
The purpose of the evaluation will be to enable NSP Steering Committee, NGOs as well as NSP Donors, to:
evaluate the impact of NSP on the security of NGOsThe key findings will also help NSP senior management to review and update its strategy.
This evaluation is mandatory as part of NSP agreement with ECHO.
3.Scope of the Evaluation
The scope of the evaluation includes a detailed feedback by NSP beneficiaries on each of its services, and an attempt to quantify its impact on their security. It is also expected the evaluation will analyze the organizational set-up of NSP.
It would be important to visit some key places in Somalia / Somaliland where NSP is present. The successful consultant will have to propose a plan for the visit.
Contacts with the following stakeholders are expected:
NGOs: a representative set of at least 20 INGO and LNGO of the NGO working in Somalia and Somaliland, at both Coordination level and field level.Members of the NSP Steering CommitteeNSP Donors and more broadly the Donor communityOCHA and UNDSS, the natural UN counterpart of NSP in the UNNSP StaffNGO ConsortiumDRC, in its quality of NSP Hosting AgencyIdeally a comparative approach and set of comparison with other similar program in the world (ANSO, GANZO)4.Evaluation Criteria
The evaluation should effectively answer the following questions under each criteria:
Effectiveness: To what extent were the project objectives achieved at the results level? Did the benefits reach the target group as intended? Were benefits distributed fairly between different types of NGOs?
Efficiency: To what extent are the costs of project intervention justified by its results, taking alternatives into account?
Relevance: To what extent did the project intervention conform to the needs and priorities of target groups ?
Impact: To what extent and at which level (coordination of field) the project intervention has a direct and / or indirect impact on NGO security
Appropriateness: How well did the humanitarian activities respond to the changing demands of the situation; considering the requirements of adaptation, ownership, accountability, and cost-effectiveness?
Coordination: What mechanisms were put in place for coordination with the NGOs, UN, local authorities, donors, and other actors; and how effective were they?
5.Key Tasks:
The key tasks for this consultancy are:
Develop an Inception Report detailing among other things; the process and methodologies to be employed to achieve the objective of this consultancy as stated above. It should include the interview schedules, and important time schedules for this exercise, and present to NSP for review and further inputs.Undertake desk review of the relevant project documents that include the Proposals, Implementation Plans, Project Implementation Reports, NSP strategy documents and any other relevant documents and should take into consideration ECHO evaluation guidelines and standards.Design data collection methodology as appropriate, guided by the international evaluation standards and relevant framework(s).Design, develop, critique (with NSP team) and refine data collection tools including translation to the local Somalilanguage, where appropriate.Carry out data collection, entry and analysis and write up the Evaluation Report. The format of the report shall include the following:Executive Summaryo Summary Table of key issues and recommendations; after Executive Summary
Preliminary pages – Acknowledgment, Acronyms and Table of contents
Main text, to include:
o Background Information: Brief on the Project and context; Evaluation – purpose and objectives; evaluation limitations
o Methodology: Design, Sampling technique and Sample size
o Findings: Analysis based on evaluation criteria and interpretation
o Key accomplishments and Summary of project assessment
o Lessons learnt, Best practices and opportunities for improvement
o Recommendations
Appendices: Evaluation tools, evaluation ToR, sample framework, bibliography, etc.
N/B:*The report will be reviewed and approved by NSP before final payment is released.*
Present the draft report to NSP team for review before producing a second draftPresent a Draft Evaluation Report (2nd draft report) to NSP, NSP Steering Committee and Donors in a workshop to facilitate sharing of evaluation results with a view to incorporate inputs from project stakeholders in the final draft.Submit a Final Evaluation Report to NSP as stated in the Consultancy Contract.6.Key Deliverables
Soft copy of the Report in two (2) CDs.The consultant will also be required to submit to NSP all study materials including:Soft copies of all data sets both quantitative and qualitativeAll filled quantitative data collection tools and qualitative data recording materials.Any other non-consumable documents/items that will be used in the course of the planned consultancy7.NSP’s Responsibilities:
The Consultant will be responsible to the NSP Program Manager. NSP staff in the evaluation areas will provide necessary support to the evaluation team, as may be needed.
NSP will provide the following:
Transport to and from the field.Travel insurance to the consultantAll necessary project documents as requested by the ConsultantAccommodation to consultantPay consultancy fees at a mutually agreed rateThe terms and conditions of service will follow DRC terms for consultancies. Payment will be done according to the financial procedures of DRC.
8.Duration of the Consultancy
NSP envisages that the consultancy will take 20 days, from the time the contract is signed. The Consultant/Consultancy Firm should develop a feasible work plan/activity schedule covering a maximum of 20 days and submit as integral part of the proposal for this consultancy.
The successful bidder must commit to accomplish and deliver the consultancy services and deliverables before or on December 15, 2014 by close of business.
9.Expected Profile of the Consultant
For this Consultancy, NSP is expecting to contract 1 lead consultant.
The consultant should have the following:
Advanced degree and experience in development evaluation or social sciencesIn depth experience in security management for NGOs, whether at a country director level or as the main security manager of an NGO.Documented experience in participatory project evaluationBe familiarized, as a regular user, to NSP products or other similar security programsExperience in evaluating other similar security programs is a strong advantageExperience of Somalia is a strong advantageGood interpersonal relation and understanding cultural sensitivitiesStrong analytical and report writing skillsDemonstrable capacity to deliver high quality outputs within the proposed timeframeIf you feel you fit the required profile, please send in an Expressions of interest (EoI), including:
CV (s) with details of qualifications, experience, telephone number and names of three referees,technical proposal that summarizes your understanding of the TOR, the proposed evaluation approach and tools to be used,financial proposal providing a clear and detailed cost estimate andthe foreseen work plan for the days.Send your application latest by November 15th, 2012via email to david@nspsomalia.orgindicating ‘NSP Consultancy for Evaluation’ in the subject line.
10.Evaluation and award of consultancy
NSP will evaluate the proposals and award the assignment based on technical and financial feasibility. NSP reserves the right to accept or reject any proposal received without giving reasons and is not bound to accept the lowest or the highest bidder.
This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.
Jul 3, 2014
June 2014 – January 2015
The project is build on three previous phases funded by ECHO aims to: To increase the capacity of communities to plan, prepare and withstand shocks and stresses; To increase the capacity of county structures to plan and prepare to shocks and stresses; To enhance consortium capacity to coordinate and initiate early response to localized crisis. Objectives
Background: The NDMA is currently engaged in a substantial revision of its early warning system and process, at National and County levels, in view of strengthening its early warning system and allow more appropriate and timely response when needed.
ECHO is funding a Consortium of consortium of international NGOs (ACTED, Oxfam, VSF-G and Concern Worldwide) across the Arid and Semi-Arid Lands of Kenya to build community resilience to recurrent hazards.
Within this consortium, ACTED is committed to support continued enhancement of early warning system in two pilot Counties, Baringo and Mandera.The project is build on three previous phases funded by ECHO aims to: To increase the capacity of communities to plan, prepare and withstand shocks and stresses; To increase the capacity of county structures to plan and prepare to shocks and stresses; To enhance consortium capacity to coordinate and initiate early response to localized crisis. Objectives
Provision of strategic technical support to ACTED for improved County level early warning using contextual local knowledge to ensure appropriate data collection and levels of analysis;Documentation of lessons learnt based on the pilot activities, with recommendations for improvements to pilot design.The consultant will tackle the following aspects of the Kenya early warning system:Understand how the information collected on each early warning indicator is analyzed within the Baringo and Mandera livelihood contexts;Recommendations on tackling the issues of data reliability and availability;Provide feedback and areas of improvement for the early warning products and their dissemination;Link early warning analysis and key parameter data with contingency planning and response analysis drawing from technical development from the Global ERC project Situation and Response Analysis Framework and the County contingency planning process.Development of a broader strategy paper, building on the Baringo workshop report linking to the developing work plan;Incorporate learning and link with activities from other related initiatives (ERC, etc.);Meeting with the NDMA at Nairobi level to ensure buy-in and share the strategy paper (draft) and work plan. August - September 2014 (6 days)Meeting with La Nina Consortium and share the strategy paper; Travel to Baringo to attend a CSG meeting as an observer; Meeting with NDMA at local level and share the strategy; Preparation of Mandera workshop (no mission): agenda, content, outputs / outcomes; Development and implementation of a format to track progress of the pilot initiatives in Baringo and Mandera in relation with ACTED’s AME Manager and linked to the ECHO proposal. Development of a short interim report taking stock of progress to date (3-4 pages) with the program advisor and the AME Manager.November - December 2014 (5 days)Preparation and facilitation of a 2 day multi - stakeholder workshop, with Baringo and Mandera NDMA, and national key stakeholders: NDMA, Ministries, ECHO, FEWS NET, WFP, FAO, UNICEF to share progress realized so far and future working opportunities. Development and finalization of a final report.Total number of days: 25
Expected inputs from ACTED
ACTED will provide:
The necessary support and guidance including regular feedback on pilot initiatives in Baringo and Mandera counties;M & E will provide short reports based on lesson learning formats;Logistics: transportation and accommodation during field visit. Strategic brief based on Baringo workshop report and links to other initiatives;Short interim report taking stock of progress to date with recommendations for the pilot activities (3-4 pages);Synthesis of Lessons Learnt from the pilot activities;Preparation and facilitation of workshops. Minimum Master degree in political science, humanitarian or development or development economics; At least 15 years in international experiences in Early Warning and Disaster Risk Management; Relevant working experience in Kenya (minimum 8 years); Experience in communication with external actors, partners and donors; Excellent writing and verbal communication skills; Experience in assessment and monitoring; Excellent analytical skills. Please provide CV and cover letter to Nairobi.administration@acted.org on or before 4th July 2014Apr 26, 2014
Evaluation of the ‘Emergency Nutrition Assistance for Drought Affected Vulnerable Communities of Turkana County of Kenya’
Project funded by USAID’s Office of U.S. Foreign Disaster Assistance (USAID/OFDA)
iii. Effectiveness: In particular assess the extent to which program interventions achieved the desired outcomes, factoring in issues of program management including decision making processes, risk management, institutional arrangements and partnerships with MOH and other agencies and their effects on the program results.
iv. Efficiency: the relationship between the quantity, quality, and timeliness of program inputs, including personnel, training, office equipment. In addition, determine the quantity, quality, and timeliness of the outputs generated and whether the resources were spent as economically as possible.
v. Sustainability: assess the readiness of partner (MOH) and other stakeholders to sustain program interventions, in particular assess the infrastructure and systems of partners, resources available to sustain the activities and services, collaborative links and referral networks with other service providers, and the level of community ownership.
vi. Program Improvement areas: capture key successes, best practices lessons learnt, implementation challenges, constraints, strengths and weaknesses.
vii. Determine the extent of complementarity of this project with other related health and nutrition projects currently supported by UNICEF in Turkana County.
viii. Role of beneficiary consultation in programme design and implementation, and areas for improvement.
1.3. What is the level of integration of health and nutrition activities in the MOH facilities in areas of Merlin operation and what lessons can be derived from current implementation approach?
1.4. What is the level of sustainability for the project results? What linkages have been created and or exploited by the project to sustainably address malnutrition among the target communities?
1.5. What are the costs and effectiveness of implementing the health and nutrition activities in Turkana? Are the project implementation approaches cost effective in relation to practical realities on the ground?
1.6. What lessons have been learnt through the implementation of this project?
The Consultant is expected to undertake the following tasks:Design and develop appropriate tools/mechanisms that will enable the analysis of the supplied information.Analyse collected information and write up a report detailing findings using Merlin’s evaluation policy and templates. Submit draft report for reviewPresent final report to Save the Children.Submit a final hardcopy report as well as soft copies in word and PDF formatsPreparation of a PowerPoint of the evaluation methodology and key findings, for further dissemination, and a delivery of that presentation to key project staff. The evaluation process must be impartial, independent and must provide information that is credible and useful, enabling the incorporation of lessons learnt, and identify the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats to inform future decision-making process within Save the Children, MoH and donors.
The consultant should have the following qualifications and experience:Relevant academic and professional background in humanitarian interventions in complex environments. Extensive practical experience in conducting evaluations of humanitarian interventions in the ASAL regions of Kenya with preference given to significant emergency nutrition programming. Technical research skills, including qualitative and quantitative approaches.Fluency in both written and spoken English and Kiswahili. Knowledge and experience of working in Turkana is preferred.Submission of Expression of Interest
All interested consultants/firms are requested to write an expression of interest following the attached EOI format ONLY by email to: Kenya.jobapplications@savethechildren.org by 30th April 2014 COB. Please include the Tiltle of the TOR on the subject line.
Format for the evaluation report:
a) Executive summary
b) Project description
c) Context of the evaluation
d) Evaluation methodology
e) Findings
f) Lessons learnt, best practices, and recommended actions for the review of primary users
g) Annex (es) as necessary
Project funded by USAID’s Office of U.S. Foreign Disaster Assistance (USAID/OFDA)
Terms of Reference (ToR)
1. Introduction and background information:
The subsequent scaling up of nutrition interventions has resulted in improvement of nutritional status of children and pregnant and lactating women.
As part of the general scaling up of nutrition activities, Merlin since April 2013 has been implementing an OFDA funded emergency nutrition support project in Turkana County. The project ended on 31st January 2014. Since February 1st 2014 Merlin has merged with Save the Children to create a world-class humanitarian health force for children and their families living in some of the most challenging places in the world.
Project Objectives and Expected Results
The overall goal of the project was to contribute to the reduction of levels of morbidity and mortality amongst drought affected vulnerable communities, particularly under-five children and pregnant and lactating women, in Turkana Central, Loima, Turkana South, and Turkana North districts of Northern Kenya.
Main highlights of the project strategy for implementation of this action included:Integration of nutrition and health issues like the prevention and management of diseases like diarrhea, that negatively impact on nutritional status and vice versaStrengthening of hygiene practices to reduce the incidence of diarrheal disease associated with contaminated water in the household including health education to educate the community on domestic treatment of drinking water and effective hand washing (soap/ash) and use of latrines/toilets. In particular, a focus on longer-term strategies with a behaviour change communication (BCC) component that would help to translate knowledge to practice.Implementation of community-led infant and young child feeding practices program with the involvement of mother-to-mother peer support groups.Distribution of micronutrients and de-worming.Community and household level screening together with approaches that will avoid at risk children deteriorating, especially in the lean seasonal period. One approach will be the linking of households with children recently discharged from SFP programme to GFD (FFA), to reduce the relapse cases, due to household food insecurity.Management of moderate and severe acute malnutritionSupporting district health authorities to developing joint emergency preparedness and response plans The project was also based upon the partnership framework between the MoH, UNICEF and other partners to support the delivery of essential nutrition services in Kenya. This partnership framework envisaged that general principles of support to MoH should include:- Full integration of a comprehensive package of high impact nutrition interventions. Results based orientation to programming. Full commitment to coordination. Strategic development of capacity at all levels of service delivery to enable the MoH function well with minimal or no support from partners. Direct involvement in service delivery only in exceptional casesFocus on mentoring, supportive supervision and on-the-job training.2. Overall objective of the Evaluation:
As the ‘EMERGENCY NUTRITION ASSISTANCE FOR DROUGHT AFFECTED VULNERABLE COMMUNITIES OF TURKANA COUNTY’ grant has ended, Save the Children wishes to undertake an external evaluation of the project – focusing on achievements, successes, lessons learnt and best practices.
These will be assessed against the OECD-DAC criteria that are most relevant to the purpose of this evaluation.3. Specific Objectives:
i. Outputs and outcomes: Outputs and outcomes generated by the program in relation to the stated goal, objectives and desired results. In particular, the evaluation will assess the effects of the program activities on the targeted beneficiaries in OTP, SFP and community members reached with the various services.
iii. Effectiveness: In particular assess the extent to which program interventions achieved the desired outcomes, factoring in issues of program management including decision making processes, risk management, institutional arrangements and partnerships with MOH and other agencies and their effects on the program results.
iv. Efficiency: the relationship between the quantity, quality, and timeliness of program inputs, including personnel, training, office equipment. In addition, determine the quantity, quality, and timeliness of the outputs generated and whether the resources were spent as economically as possible.
v. Sustainability: assess the readiness of partner (MOH) and other stakeholders to sustain program interventions, in particular assess the infrastructure and systems of partners, resources available to sustain the activities and services, collaborative links and referral networks with other service providers, and the level of community ownership.
vi. Program Improvement areas: capture key successes, best practices lessons learnt, implementation challenges, constraints, strengths and weaknesses.
vii. Determine the extent of complementarity of this project with other related health and nutrition projects currently supported by UNICEF in Turkana County.
viii. Role of beneficiary consultation in programme design and implementation, and areas for improvement.
4. Methodology
The following methodologies shall be used for the evaluation:
Evaluation Design
Both quantitative and qualitative methods may be used for the study.The qualitative method will for example employ focus group discussions with target groups, employ interviewer administered structured questionnaires to stakeholders - government, beneficiaries, MoH, WFP and UNICEF, as well as in-depth interview of key informants and document review, both primary and secondary. The quantitative method will review existing data related to the outcome indicators supplied by Merlin/MoH, and verify sample of same in the field. The consultant will use information both from primary and secondary sources which are directly related to the project. For triangulation purposes, the consultant is expected to refer to documents from Save the Children / MoH reports and national and sub-national statistics, research findings relevant to this project and donor guidance and associated documents. These sources will be used to validate the results and triangulate successes and failures for lessons documentation.Key evaluation questions
1.1. How far has the implementation and delivery of the project activities, especially the choice of beneficiaries and organisational modalities, facilitated the achievement of specific objectives?
1.3. What is the level of integration of health and nutrition activities in the MOH facilities in areas of Merlin operation and what lessons can be derived from current implementation approach?
1.4. What is the level of sustainability for the project results? What linkages have been created and or exploited by the project to sustainably address malnutrition among the target communities?
1.5. What are the costs and effectiveness of implementing the health and nutrition activities in Turkana? Are the project implementation approaches cost effective in relation to practical realities on the ground?
1.6. What lessons have been learnt through the implementation of this project?
Study Area
The evaluation will be conducted in locations determined by the evaluator(s) in consultation with Save the Children, but has to be within Save the Children’s geographical area of operation.
Data collection and analysis
The evaluation should be participatory and focus on obtaining both qualitative and quantitative information.Quantitative data obtained from Save the Children on key indicators to triangulate with baseline data.Qualitative data obtained from FGDs, key informant interviews and structures questionnaires. Project document review, individual interview of project staff, government, UNICEF, WFP and other partners.5. Responsibility of the consultant / deliverablesThe Consultant is expected to undertake the following tasks:Design and develop appropriate tools/mechanisms that will enable the analysis of the supplied information.Analyse collected information and write up a report detailing findings using Merlin’s evaluation policy and templates. Submit draft report for reviewPresent final report to Save the Children.Submit a final hardcopy report as well as soft copies in word and PDF formatsPreparation of a PowerPoint of the evaluation methodology and key findings, for further dissemination, and a delivery of that presentation to key project staff. The evaluation process must be impartial, independent and must provide information that is credible and useful, enabling the incorporation of lessons learnt, and identify the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats to inform future decision-making process within Save the Children, MoH and donors.
6. Key outputs of the evaluation are
A report completed on Save the Children reporting template (final hardcopy report as well as soft copies in word and PDF formats);A PowerPoint of the evaluation methodology and key findings;Presentation of key findings to project staff and county representatives prior to drafting the evaluation report; An evaluation report completed with recommendations7. Required Qualification and ExperienceThe consultant should have the following qualifications and experience:Relevant academic and professional background in humanitarian interventions in complex environments. Extensive practical experience in conducting evaluations of humanitarian interventions in the ASAL regions of Kenya with preference given to significant emergency nutrition programming. Technical research skills, including qualitative and quantitative approaches.Fluency in both written and spoken English and Kiswahili. Knowledge and experience of working in Turkana is preferred.Submission of Expression of Interest
All interested consultants/firms are requested to write an expression of interest following the attached EOI format ONLY by email to: Kenya.jobapplications@savethechildren.org by 30th April 2014 COB. Please include the Tiltle of the TOR on the subject line.
The evaluation criteria are based on technical and financial responsiveness which also includes a valid licence and tax registration.
The key technical evaluation criteria are:Known reliability in delivery of timely and quality servicesRelevant field/country experienceRelevant sector specific technical experience and qualificationsRelevant evaluation experience Presentation and writing skills evident from the proposalDemonstrated understanding of the work proposed in the TORClarification of methodologyCost/budget9. Ownership of the deliverablesSave the Children shall have full ownership of the report, research, working papers and other results of the Consultant’s work under this assignment.
The Consultant shall not publish nor otherwise use any portion of the report without the written authorization of Merlin. The consultant shall waive any copyright to the work produced as a result of the contract.10. Timeline
In consultation with project staff, the consultant shall design the review work plan and develop the evaluation instruments including appropriate questionnaires.
The review is expected to take two weeks and additional six paid days have been catered for report writing. The study is expected to apply participatory approaches along with quantitative and qualitative methodologies.Format for the evaluation report:
The final report shall at least consist of the following sections:
a) Executive summary
b) Project description
c) Context of the evaluation
d) Evaluation methodology
e) Findings
f) Lessons learnt, best practices, and recommended actions for the review of primary users
g) Annex (es) as necessary
10. Logistics/Transport/Accommodation
Apr 24, 2014
Terms of Reference for a Short Term Consultant to Rappoteur at Four National Consultation and Validation Forums on Post CSW Dissemination, Beijing +20 National Review, Post 2015 and CEDAW.
The Commission on the Status of Women (CSW) is convened every year at the United Nations Head Quarters in New York. The forum brings together UN member states to evaluate progress, identify challenges, set global targets and form concrete policies to promote gender equality and women’s empowerment.
The Ministry of Devolution and planning participated in the 58th session of the commission on the status of women (CSW) held in New York, USA from 10th – 21st March 2014. The theme for this year’s CSW was ‘Achievement and challenges towards the realization of the MDGs for women and Girls’. The session reviewed the theme on the Agreed Conclusions of the 55th session on Access and participation of women and girls to education, training, science and technology, including for the promotion of women’s equal access to full employment and decent work.
The deadline for submission of applications is COB Tuesday 29th April 2014.
1.0 Background
The Commission on the Status of Women (CSW) is convened every year at the United Nations Head Quarters in New York. The forum brings together UN member states to evaluate progress, identify challenges, set global targets and form concrete policies to promote gender equality and women’s empowerment.
The Ministry of Devolution and planning participated in the 58th session of the commission on the status of women (CSW) held in New York, USA from 10th – 21st March 2014. The theme for this year’s CSW was ‘Achievement and challenges towards the realization of the MDGs for women and Girls’. The session reviewed the theme on the Agreed Conclusions of the 55th session on Access and participation of women and girls to education, training, science and technology, including for the promotion of women’s equal access to full employment and decent work.
During the 58th CSW preparatory work, the Ministry of Devolution and Planning through the Gender Directorate proposed a logical linkage of the intergovernmental processes for Beijing +20 national review report, Kenya post 2015 final report and CEDAW periodic report. The post CSW forum would set the stage for Beijing + 20 national reviews.
The Consultant will accurately capture the proceedings of the national consultative meetings and integrate and summarize them in a manner that will substantively contribute to the National reports due in the above referenced dates. Working closely with Technical staff from the Directorate in ensuring that the final reports reflect the actual proceedings of the national consultation forums and there is a logical flow of information in the report.
The Consultant will work closely with the Director of social and economic unit within the Gender Directorate in carrying out the assignment.Elaborating the national consultative meetings proceedings.Editing and reviewing the document after feedback from the Gender Directorate and main stakeholders and as necessary avail expert input.Presenting the final repots to the Gender DirectorateThe Consultant shall provide:- Four reports on post CSW dissemination forum, Beijing +20 national reviews, post 2015 consultation meeting and CEDAW national validation meeting. The repots shall be in soft copy and no more than 20 pages each.
The assignment is for a period of 12 days. Commencing 1ST May 2014
5.0 Key Performance Indicators
Post CSW dissemination forum reportBeijing +20 national reviews repotPost 2015 consultation meeting reportCEDAW national validation meeting reportThe ideal consultant for this assignment should have a minimum of an undergraduate degree in the field of Gender, human rights, law, social science and must have demonstrable extensive experience in undertaking similar work. In addition to this the applicant should:-Sound knowledge of the MDGs and the post 2015 agenda;Demonstrate their understanding of the TORs;Demonstrate the ability and capacity to undertake the assignment. This should include details of similar assignmentsHave fluency in English, excellent writing skills and demonstrable capacity to work with diverse stakeholders including Government of Kenya officials.Computer literacy is critical.The consultant shall submit detailed CVs with relevant certificates
Duration: The consultant will work for 12 days from 28th April – 30th November 2014.
Deliverables and timelines to be agreed upon2) Capture of actual proceedings
7.0 Application process
The deadline for submission of applications is COB Tuesday 29th April 2014.
Apr 4, 2014
Terms of Reference
Requirements
Role: Staff Group Counselling / Staff Debriefing Sessions on Monthly Basis
Duration: 1 day per session (between April to August 2014)
Child Protection Level: Level 3
Venue: Dadaab
Background: Save the Children has been operational in the Dadaab refugee camps since 2007 when a child protection programme was established.
The programme is now one of Save the Children’s largest child protection programmes globally and can be termed multi-sector: Programmes focus on gender-based violence prevention and response; response to children without appropriate care, including family tracing and reunification, foster care placement and resettlement to third countries; case management of other protection concerns; individual and group counselling; children’s participation and psychosocial support through Child Education and Welfare Centres and Children’s Clubs; training to police, teachers and agencies; and working with community groups.Save the Children’s Child Protection Team includes Paediatric counsellors, Lay counsellors, Child Protection Officers, Best Interests Determination (BID) Officers, Coordinators and Manager who come into contact with children, particularly survivors of abuse either first or second-hand, in their daily work.
As a result of this regular exposure to accounts of abuse, distress and trauma, Save the Children has committed to provide regular group counselling or staff debriefing sessions in an effort to alleviate the impact of this exposure on staff well-being and effectiveness.
In line with this, Save the Children is seeking a consultant counsellor to facilitate group counselling sessions for child protection team on monthly basis starting from March to August 2014.
The consultant counsellor will pay for his/her accommodation and meals while residing in Dadaab Save the Children compound, in full adherence to Save the Children’s Code of Conduct, Child Safeguarding Policy, Data Protection and Information Sharing Protocol and Safety and Security Rules. S/he will have the option of residing in other partner agency compounds at his/her costs while adhering to partner agency’s Code of Conduct and security regulations. Transport for the Consultant Counsellor to Dadaab and back for every trip will also be taken care of by the consultant.Deliverables: Save the Children is seeking the services of a specialist in Group Counselling to provide regular support to the Save the Children’s Dadaab child protection programme staff, including BID and Child Protection Officers, Counsellors and lay counsellors – thus a total of 71 staff.
Requirements
Essential
Extensive training and experience in the provision of individual counselling to children and their families Extensive experience in the provision of counselling to adults working with children experiencing abuseTraining and experience in the provision of counselling supervision Understanding of the stresses of working in remote and hostile environments, such as DadaabDemonstrated competence working across Kenyan cultures, as well as age and gender barriers, and accommodating for these dynamics during group sessionsHigh capacity in building trust and rapport in groups working together in teams under high stress Fluency in written and spoken English and KiswahiliStrong sense of professionalismDirect experience in child protection and gender-based violence programmingAppreciation of the importance of community and child participation when working to create behaviour change, raise awareness and protect childrenUnderstanding of the importance of and means of ensuring accountability to beneficiaries during programmingExperience working in North Eastern Province or with Somali communitiesPrevious experience working with Save the ChildrenHow to ApplyThe application process is now open and will close on 12th April 2014 at 5.00 p.m.
To apply for this position, please fill the attached EoI (click here to download), send a short cover letter and CV to Kenya.jobapplications@savethechildren.org indicating the position title on the subject line.Jun 27, 2013
Terms of Reference for Documentation of Best Practices in Health and Nutrition Programme
Background Information
Save the Children is the world's largest independent organization for children, making a difference to children's lives in over 120 countries. We deliver immediate and lasting improvements to children's lives worldwide. Save the Children listens to children, involves children and ensures their views are taken into account.Save the Children secures and protects children's rights - to food, shelter, healthcare, education and freedom from violence, abuse and exploitation.
Our vision is a world in which every child attains the right to survival, protection, development and participation.
Our mission is to inspire breakthroughs in the way the world treats children, and to achieve immediate and lasting change in their lives.
Save the Children has been operational in Kenya for more than 20 years, working on four core thematic areas: right to Health, right to Freedom from Hunger, right to Education and right to Protection. The rights-based approach of our interventions is founded on four interlocking pillars: direct programming, political and policy change, popular mobilization and fundraising. We provide support through both longer term development work and humanitarian relief in emergencies
Save the Children has a strong track record of supporting health systems strengthening through direct interventions, policy analysis and advocacy especially on key building blocks of high-quality health systems namely financing, governance and human resources.As a child rights organization, we are committed to ascertain and follow the priorities of the communities we work with and to increase child and community participation in governance, policy-making and delivery of health services.
Save the Children received co-funding from both ECHO and DFID to support the Ministry of Health (MOH) to implement High Impact Nutrition Interventions (HINI) in Wajir and Mandera Counties starting from 1st July 2012 to 31st December 2013. The support to the MOH is provided in accordance with the new implementation strategy that shifts the responsibility of implementation of HINI programme activities to the Ministry of Health, with technical, logistical and financial support provided by Save the Children. The High Impact Interventions (HINI) are being implemented at both health facilities and hard-to-reach areas.Save the Children is currently supporting the MOH to implement High Impact Interventions, as adoption of the new strategy of indirect nutrition programme implementation. This process needs to be documented systematically so as to capture key challenges; best practices and lessons learnt which would then be shared with the MOH, Donors and other stakeholders for further scale up to other counties. Ultimately such lessons learnt, best practices and discussions should feed into the review of relevant national nutrition policies and guidelines.To document in both narrative and film selected aspects of the current Save the Children nutrition programme in Wajir and Mandera Counties. The review of this documentation by Save the Children will help in the determination of best practices and lessons learnt.The scope of this consultancy includes, but is not limited to, the following:
a) Develop tentative consultancy work-plan
b) Narrative and film documentation of the health and nutrition programmes, focusing on the following areas:
1) Provision of technical support by Save the Children to MoH key nutrition and health staffs Advantages of the current implementation strategy over the previous direct implementation.What is the sustainability of the HINI activities in the districts?2) The provision of logistical support to Ministry of Health to deliver High Impact Nutrition Interventions (HINI) in hard-to-reach areas.What are the types and quantity of logistical support provided to the Ministry of Health?What logistical support is usually provided to MOH? How are the monthly vehicle movement plans drawn or prepared and by whom? How the supplies (i.e. RUTF) are distributed from the district Hospitals to the rural facilities and who does the D-plan.?Is the logistical support provided adequate?
3) The participation of Community Health Workers (CHWs) in the delivery of High Impact Nutrition Interventions in hard-to-reach areas. What roles do CHWs perform in the delivery of High Impact Nutrition Interventions and other health interventions?What is their level of motivation?What are the challenges they face?What are their recommendations?Perception of CHWs on the partnership with SC and MOH
4) The recruitment and secondment of health workers to support the Ministry of Health in the delivery of High Impact Nutrition Interventions (HINI)How was the recruitment conducted?What are the mechanisms for remuneration of seconded personnel?What are the Ministry’s future plans for the seconded staffs?What are the roles and responsibilities of the county government to support the deployment of personnel to the facilities to complement partner’s efforts?What advocacy role has SCI participated in at district and county level to ensure adequate staff to support health and nutrition programs in the region?
5) Integrated Management of Acute Malnutrition at hard-to-reach areasDocument the screening and admission processes. Document the pre-mixing of CSB and cooking oil.Document the provision of IMAM rations at hard-to-reach areas.Document emerging issues regarding the stabilization centersDocument success stories of children admitted in the IMAM program
6) High Impact Nutrition Interventions at Health FacilitiesDocument the package (range of services) and integration of High Impact Nutrition Interventions (HINI) at health facilities.Document the challenges/lessons learnt by the in-charges who also deliver services in their catchment outreach sites.Document the linkages in the integration of health and nutrition services in relation to implementation
7) Mother to mother support groups/care support groupsHow were the MTMSGs formed?Which functions do they perform to promote the uptake of the recommended maternal, infant and young child Nutrition (MIYCN) practices?What are the motivational factors?What have been some of the achievement of MTMSG in the promotion of MIYCN practices as well as hygiene promotion at the community? What impact has the training had in regard to uptake of services and behavior change?What has been the role of men in the promotion of MIYCN practices through the care support groups? What impact has it had?What are the challenges they face? How are these being addressed?What are the sustainability practices? (E.g. are there any successful income-generating activities initiated by the mothers and kitchen gardens etc.)What is the role of the community in regard to supporting the MTMSG to provide services?Document a case study on severely malnourished child with medical complications.Document a case study on a malnourished pregnant or lactating motherDocument case study on successful Mother to Mother support Group.Document case studies on the trends and linkages of the program from mobilization, assessments, referral to facilities, interventions, discharges and referral back to community as well as linkages to sustainable strategies ( Nutrition Care Process holistic approach)
9. GoK roles and responsibilities including the role of MOH, other line ministries including water and irrigation, Agriculture and the devolved county government. What has been the Ministry of Health’s contribution/ role in the nutrition programme? What has been the role of the District and County in Advocacy to support health and nutrition interventions?( these includes HRH)The role of DHMT in systems strengthening, advocacy and resource mobilization to complement the role of partners in the region? What are the overall challenges and what impact have they felt from the Save the Children’s supported programs?The consultant shall be responsible for:Concise Narrative Report (not more than 50 pages double-spaced, Times New Roman font size 12) on best practices and lessons learnt in the nutrition programme.Film documentary on key areas in the nutrition programme (submitted in 3 or more quality CDs)Support to be provided by Save the Children Save the Children will provide the following support towards the successful execution of consultancy:Provide logistics to the consultant for field activities.Make arrangements with beneficiaries, community members and partners.Provide translators (if need be)Consultant’s daily rate Avail documents/information relevant to the project context that the consultant might require. Information might also be obtained from programme staff; MOH staff; mother-to-mother support groups; CHWs and beneficiaries through interviews.This consultancy will be conducted in July 2013 and is expected to last between 8 to 12 days.
The exercise will be coordinated from Save the Children field offices in Wajir and Mandera Counties. Save the Children will facilitate the consultant’s travel from Nairobi to the field office and field sites. Save the Children will as well provide administrative, logistics, accommodation, meals and security-related support to ensure smooth implementation of the consultancy. The consultant will be required to abide by the organization’s security procedures as well as other applicable rules and regulations, including the code of conduct.Technical guidance and supervision for the consultant will be provided by the Health and Nutrition Programme Managers and Area Programme Managers.Knowledge and understanding of community nutrition programmes.Demonstrated experience in conducting similar work (film documentation of best practices) for international non-governmental organizationsKnowledge of and experience in arid, semi-arid and pastoralist environments.All interested consultants/firms are requested to write an expression of interest by: Explaining their competences to meet the requirements of the assignment.Provide a detailed professional budget in Kenya Shillings (indicate daily professional rates) Provide tentative work-plan and duration of the assignment and when ready to undertake the assignment. Kindly note that the work-plan might be subject to revision once the consultant has been selected.Provide evidence of similar work undertaken in the recent past (not more than 5 years)Please send your application by email to: Kenya.jobapplications@savethechildren.org.
Please indicate ‘DOCUMENTATION OF BEST PRACTICES’ as the subject heading.
Application deadline: 26th June 2013, 5.00pm
Any canvassing will lead to automatic disqualification.
Sep 28, 2012
Sep 15, 2012
Terms of Reference to conduct Baseline Survey
Kwiminia CBO a non-profit making community based organisation (CBO) registered with the ministry of culture and children affairs since 2006 whose aim is environmental conservation in its area of operation.
Kwiminia (CBO) has received funding from Danida through Community Environment Facility (CEF II) of the Community Development Trust Fund (CDTF) to implement a Two year project titled “Lower Mbooni Integrated Environmental Conservation project” in the locations of Kalawa, Waia, Kiteta, Kisau and Ngiluni in Mbooni East District of Makueni County. The project objective is “To support community projects aimed at poverty reduction through improved livelihood systems and the conservation of community natural resources and initiatives for enhanced environmental management and governance”
1.1 Purpose of the Baseline study
The overall objective of this survey is to establish the pre-intervention situation prior to project start up hereby preparing the ground for project performance measurement. The principal focus of the baseline is on collecting and analysing pre-intervention data relating to the indicators (OVIs) for the Intermediate and Final Goals. The baseline is done to establish benchmarks for the chosen indicators, i.e., to provide data on their initial status so that subsequent monitoring and evaluation can assess the effects and impacts of the project for the target population. The baseline also has the purpose of assessing the measurability of the selected indicators and will, if necessary, be used to fine tune them for future follow-up.
The study will help to establish the degraded land in forest and riparian areas, sources of fuel, level of fuel wood use, accessibility to safe water, level of knowledge in environmental conservation, level of utilization of natural resources. In addition, it will help to establish the current status of livelihoods within the project location. This will be in relation to the main project activities to be implemented by the project which are:
a.) Renewable energy and biomass efficient devices
b.) Capacity building of community members
d.) Environmental conservation: tree planting and soil and water conservation
e.) Nature based enterprises (IGA’s)
1.3 Specific Objectives of the study
The baseline study shall provide:Baseline status on all impact, outcome and key output indicators.Provide analytical report on likelihood behavioral changes/adoption rates as pertains to various planned interventions versus socio-economic and environmental or any other issues.Assess potential for project ownership and sustainability of the proposed interventionsReview the project’s M&E plan and make concrete suggestions for improvements of the M/&E system taking into account notably cost efficiency and effectiveness in methodologiesReview the project’s M&E system including tools and provide technical advice on how they can be enhanced for impact measurementIdentify and recommend opportunities and synergies for better results and leverage / linkagesExpected positive and negative effects/risks of the project, and possible mitigation measures.The consultant is expected to have experience and academic qualification in the following areas:Advanced university degree in natural resource management/natural resources based enterprises/agronomy/agriculture, community development, development studiesProven experience in conducting quality surveys, evaluations, assessmentsUnderstanding of operations in the natural resources/agricultural sector, and value chainsProficiency in data analysis and report writingProficiency in use of computers, especially latest word processing packages and MS Office packages in general, and software package for qualitative and quantitative data analysis.2.2 Responsibilities of consultant
The consultant, in consultation with PIC and other stakeholders, will be responsible in the following:Formation of a baseline teamReview of the project documentsIdentifying and define baseline priority areas and indicatorsPlan and implement data collection.Design, critique and refine the field data collection tools.Facilitate survey crew training and data collection tools i.e. field pre-testing.Facilitate the design of data input screens development, supervision of data entry, data cleaning and data quality.Perform data analysis and report writing.Review draft M&E planWrite-up of a concise baseline report with annexes.Present a draft report to PIC and other stakeholders in a feedback session and incorporate relevant suggestions in a final report.3.0 The Baseline study methodology
The baseline study methodology will include but not limited to the following aspects:The baseline survey is expected to use both quantitative and qualitative methods of data collection for triangulation purposes.Document review will be conducted to complement other information sourcesThe consultant will be expected to collect information widely across all groups, organizations, etc.4.1 The Baseline Survey Outputs:Inception reportBaseline Survey data collection toolsDraft baseline reportFinal Baseline surveyBaseline database,Data analysis output/summary report4.2 Consultant activity schedule
The consultancy schedule will cover months of October and November 2012.
All payments will be in Kenya shillings. There will be no advance payments. Payment will be made upon submission and acceptance of the final report by PIC and CDTF, which will be subjected to 10% withholding tax.
Firms or Consultant(s) who feel that they meet the requirements should submit expression of interest, which should include the following:
A capability statement, including commitment for availability for the entire assignmentAn elaborate study methodology including a sample questionnaire and detailed work plan etc.A detailed financial proposal, including lead consultant’s fees. The financial proposal should include daily cost per major activity.Updated curriculum vitae of the consultants who will undertake the work that clearly spells out qualifications and experience. Where more than one consultant will be involved, clearly indicate the overall lead consultant and responsible persons for the other baseline survey areas.Commitment that the consultants whose CVs are presented will be entirely engaged if consultancy is awarded.Evidence (if available) of membership to reputable Monitoring & Evaluation professional association and of any relevant to the consultancyContact of 3 organizations that have recently and preferably in the last 3 years contracted the firm/consultant(s) to carry out a baseline survey.Please send a soft copy of your expression of interest by 30.09.2012 by 5.00pm to cbokwiminia@yahoo.com
The subject line should read EOI to conduct a Baseline
Only pre-selected firms/consultants will be contacted, but contacts of even the unsuccessful will kept in file to contact them for future opportunities in the organization.
Kwiminia CBO a non-profit making community based organisation (CBO) registered with the ministry of culture and children affairs since 2006 whose aim is environmental conservation in its area of operation.
Kwiminia (CBO) has received funding from Danida through Community Environment Facility (CEF II) of the Community Development Trust Fund (CDTF) to implement a Two year project titled “Lower Mbooni Integrated Environmental Conservation project” in the locations of Kalawa, Waia, Kiteta, Kisau and Ngiluni in Mbooni East District of Makueni County. The project objective is “To support community projects aimed at poverty reduction through improved livelihood systems and the conservation of community natural resources and initiatives for enhanced environmental management and governance”
1.1 Purpose of the Baseline study
The overall objective of this survey is to establish the pre-intervention situation prior to project start up hereby preparing the ground for project performance measurement. The principal focus of the baseline is on collecting and analysing pre-intervention data relating to the indicators (OVIs) for the Intermediate and Final Goals. The baseline is done to establish benchmarks for the chosen indicators, i.e., to provide data on their initial status so that subsequent monitoring and evaluation can assess the effects and impacts of the project for the target population. The baseline also has the purpose of assessing the measurability of the selected indicators and will, if necessary, be used to fine tune them for future follow-up.
The study will help to establish the degraded land in forest and riparian areas, sources of fuel, level of fuel wood use, accessibility to safe water, level of knowledge in environmental conservation, level of utilization of natural resources. In addition, it will help to establish the current status of livelihoods within the project location. This will be in relation to the main project activities to be implemented by the project which are:
a.) Renewable energy and biomass efficient devices
b.) Capacity building of community members
d.) Environmental conservation: tree planting and soil and water conservation
e.) Nature based enterprises (IGA’s)
1.3 Specific Objectives of the study
The baseline study shall provide:Baseline status on all impact, outcome and key output indicators.Provide analytical report on likelihood behavioral changes/adoption rates as pertains to various planned interventions versus socio-economic and environmental or any other issues.Assess potential for project ownership and sustainability of the proposed interventionsReview the project’s M&E plan and make concrete suggestions for improvements of the M/&E system taking into account notably cost efficiency and effectiveness in methodologiesReview the project’s M&E system including tools and provide technical advice on how they can be enhanced for impact measurementIdentify and recommend opportunities and synergies for better results and leverage / linkagesExpected positive and negative effects/risks of the project, and possible mitigation measures.The consultant is expected to have experience and academic qualification in the following areas:Advanced university degree in natural resource management/natural resources based enterprises/agronomy/agriculture, community development, development studiesProven experience in conducting quality surveys, evaluations, assessmentsUnderstanding of operations in the natural resources/agricultural sector, and value chainsProficiency in data analysis and report writingProficiency in use of computers, especially latest word processing packages and MS Office packages in general, and software package for qualitative and quantitative data analysis.2.2 Responsibilities of consultant
The consultant, in consultation with PIC and other stakeholders, will be responsible in the following:Formation of a baseline teamReview of the project documentsIdentifying and define baseline priority areas and indicatorsPlan and implement data collection.Design, critique and refine the field data collection tools.Facilitate survey crew training and data collection tools i.e. field pre-testing.Facilitate the design of data input screens development, supervision of data entry, data cleaning and data quality.Perform data analysis and report writing.Review draft M&E planWrite-up of a concise baseline report with annexes.Present a draft report to PIC and other stakeholders in a feedback session and incorporate relevant suggestions in a final report.3.0 The Baseline study methodology
The baseline study methodology will include but not limited to the following aspects:The baseline survey is expected to use both quantitative and qualitative methods of data collection for triangulation purposes.Document review will be conducted to complement other information sourcesThe consultant will be expected to collect information widely across all groups, organizations, etc.4.1 The Baseline Survey Outputs:Inception reportBaseline Survey data collection toolsDraft baseline reportFinal Baseline surveyBaseline database,Data analysis output/summary report4.2 Consultant activity schedule
The consultancy schedule will cover months of October and November 2012.
All payments will be in Kenya shillings. There will be no advance payments. Payment will be made upon submission and acceptance of the final report by PIC and CDTF, which will be subjected to 10% withholding tax.
Firms or Consultant(s) who feel that they meet the requirements should submit expression of interest, which should include the following:
A capability statement, including commitment for availability for the entire assignmentAn elaborate study methodology including a sample questionnaire and detailed work plan etc.A detailed financial proposal, including lead consultant’s fees. The financial proposal should include daily cost per major activity.Updated curriculum vitae of the consultants who will undertake the work that clearly spells out qualifications and experience. Where more than one consultant will be involved, clearly indicate the overall lead consultant and responsible persons for the other baseline survey areas.Commitment that the consultants whose CVs are presented will be entirely engaged if consultancy is awarded.Evidence (if available) of membership to reputable Monitoring & Evaluation professional association and of any relevant to the consultancyContact of 3 organizations that have recently and preferably in the last 3 years contracted the firm/consultant(s) to carry out a baseline survey.Please send a soft copy of your expression of interest by 30.09.2012 by 5.00pm to cbokwiminia@yahoo.com
The subject line should read EOI to conduct a Baseline
Only pre-selected firms/consultants will be contacted, but contacts of even the unsuccessful will kept in file to contact them for future opportunities in the organization.
Aug 23, 2012
Oxfam Pan Africa Strategic Framework 2010-2013: Kilio cha Mabadiliko (a cry for change)
The Oxfam pan Africa framework promotes active citizenship, effective national governance and the realisation and enjoyment of fundamental freedoms and human rights contained in key AU policy standards and legal instruments. We work with social movements, CSOs and their coalitions and alliances, the African Union (AU), Regional economic blocks (RECs) and Governments to influence, popularise and implement key international and continental policy standards, pledges and human rights instruments. Our Strategic Framework 2010-2013 works towards the national implementation of these policy intentions and the protection of the rights and freedoms that they exemplify.
Consistent with our Oxfam southern campaigning principles, we also recognise that the primary agency for change in Africa lies in Africa and with African organisations. To this end, we will support a strong and autonomous pan Africa campaigning force of pan African coalitions, alliances and social movements to articulate their change objectives and work closely with their own members and partners at various levels.
What change is Oxfam Pan Africa aim to bring about?
Poverty and suffering in Africa is the consequence of unequal power relations between Africa and the global political-economy as well as the denial by African States of citizen's economic, social and human rights and fundamental freedoms. Four centuries of trans-continental slavery, a century of colonialism and two decades of Structural Adjustment Programmes (SAPs) have produced common challenges for Africa. The failure of global policy institutions to stop the over-exploitation of African resources, commodity price-fixing of Africa's resources by industrialised countries, capital flight and the global under-representation of Africa in institutions such as the United Nations and the International Finance Institutions have undermined Africa's capacity to achieve economic independence and a greater share of the world market. Oxfam believes that assertive representation of both African state and non-state actors in these global spaces is critical. Oxfam believes that a strong and dynamic civil society is a precondition for pro-poor change in Africa. Inequality, exclusion and marginalisation are the consequence of the failure of the African state to regulate the distribution of sub-soil assets and other natural resources, financial capital and markets in a fair and responsible manner. Consequently, the majority of African men, women and children remain marginalised by their lack of voice, visibility and informed participation in setting the public policy agenda and holding political elites accountable. In 2010-2013, Oxfam sought to enable, strengthen and accompany more than thirty Pan African coalitions, alliances and social movements to realise fundamental freedoms and basic human rights in three primary areas: gender justice, economic justice and democratic governance. We do this by supporting a strong and autonomous pan African campaigning force of coalitions, alliances and social movements from four offices located in Addis Ababa, Dakar, Nairobi and Den Haag, with support from the Oxfam presence in South Africa and other country offices in Africa. A joint governance and management system guides the participating affiliates.
The overall objective of the evaluation is to assess the performance as per planned outcomes, document lessons learnt in the implementation of the Pan Africa Strategic Framework (PAF) since 2010 and suggest key elements for a new phase of the programme. Specifically the evaluation will assess issues related to relevance, effectiveness, efficiency and will come up with orientations and recommendations for successful implementation of a further phase.
The specific evaluation issues to focus on are:Assess whether the analysis, theory of change, objectives and outcomes of the programme were and still are relevant, appropriate and realisticEvaluate whether Oxfam adequately adapted the implementation of the Framework to context changes in 2010-2013Assess the coherence of activities in relation to outputs and the latter in relation to outcomesEstablish the status of progress and achievements for the period by comparing actual and expected outcomes, including unintended outcomes (evidence based quantitative and qualitative findings), as well as the sustainability of theseDetermine what policy and practice changes have occurred and how they have contributed to the achievement of the outcomesAscertain how policy changes at pan Africa level translated into change at national levelAssess the status, influence and sustainability of civil society coalitions/social movements which Oxfam has supported through its PAFAscertain to which extent the PAF contributed to Oxfam campaigns, and how this has been appreciated.What are the possibilities for enhanced linking of local-regional-global programming and campaigning?Analyse the effectiveness of the information system in relation to achievements and documentation of lesson learntAssess cost efficiency of outcomes achievedAssess the strengths and weaknesses and any constraints in the implementation of the programmeAppreciate how the program contributed to gender empowerment and furthering gender equality Document lessons learnt, gaps and possible catalytic effects of actions implemented; as well as the effectiveness of the intervention strategiesMake strategic and operational recommendations for the new phase of programme
The external assessment will be carried out by (an) external consultant(s). Qualitative information gathering methods will be applied.The detailed methodology shall be proposed by the consultant(s) in consultation with Oxfam. Nevertheless, the minimum methodological steps to include are: Documentation review. This includes but not limited, program documents, annual reports, annual work plans and budgets, internal review reports, researches and policy briefs, position papers, advocacy material and communication strategies, specific notes and any external written feedback, publications, media statements, blogs, etc.… Semi structured or/and structured interviews with different stakeholders (face-to-face, by emails or by teleconference. This will include but not limited to: Oxfam staff: Pan Africa team; managers/country directors, programme officers, technical focal persons in OGB and ONL Headquarters and Oxfam country offices (at least 2 from each African region); other relevant staff including the Regional Directors, Institutional Funding Units, Campaign Teams (incl. RiC staff, GROW), etc.Partner organisations: relevant person in national and regional farmers and women’s rights networks; pan African, regional and national CSO organisations engaged in one of the four pillars of the Strategic Framework; etc. Like minded organisations Institutions we seek to influence: relevant representatives of African Union bodies, Africa Development Bank, Regional Economic Blocs, National Governments, etc. Donor community: DfID (UK), DGIS (Netherlands), SIDA (Sweden) and so on Survey/Questionnaire to consult partners and key stakeholders. Impact assessment.Country visits to one Oxfam programme each in West Africa, Southern Africa and the Horn, East and Central Africa (HECA); including visits to PAF-partners present in-country, where relevant. The methodology will include non formal feedback sessions to be done to the Reference Committee and will be organised at midterm and end of the assignment. After production of the draft report a formal restitution session will be organised with the participation of Oxfam Pan Africa staff (and representation of regional/country directors if possible).
The consultant(s) will produce and submit a quality report to the Reference Committee for the evaluation of the Oxfam Pan Africa Framework 2010-2013.
The report will have a maximum of 30 pages (excluding annexes). This report, written in English will be primary used by Oxfam, and will be shared when necessary with its donors and partners.
The evaluation report will contains at least the following elements:Executive summary, including the major findings of the evaluation and summary conclusions and recommendationsObjectives of the evaluationOutline of the methodology and its justificationLimitations of the evaluation if anyPresentation of the analysis and findings, including unexpected relevant findingsRecommendations Conclusions(Interview/Questionnaire) Reports and appendices5. Desired profile consultant(s)
The consultant(s) should have:Masters Degree in a relevant field (minimum)Specialised in international and/or social developmentAt least 5 years of consultancy experience on evaluating advocacy and campaigning programmesDemonstrated experience with focus on gender, social transformation and conflict managementExperience in programme evaluation with proven analytical skills is requiredProficiency in two of the three working languages (English, French and Portuguese) is highly desired6. Time-frame for the Evaluation
The evaluation should last a maximum of 1 month, starting from September 24th. A daily rate will be agreed with the consultant(s) for a maximum of 25 days, and according to the Oxfam standards of consultancy.
Terms of Reference External Evaluation
In 2010 Oxfam launched its first joint Pan Africa Strategic Framework, implemented by Oxfam Great Britain (OGB) and Oxfam Novib Netherlands (ONL) and funded by Oxfam America, Intermon and Australia.
The strategy sought to bring greater coherence of the work of Oxfam affiliates and a more powerful voice for policy & practices changes at Pan African level.Drawing close to the end of the implementation period of the strategic framework 2010-2013, we will commission an external evaluation of our strategy to analyse the results attained, the impact related hereto, capture lessons learnt and give orientations for the next strategic period: 2014-2017.
1. Background & Context of Evaluation
The Oxfam pan Africa framework promotes active citizenship, effective national governance and the realisation and enjoyment of fundamental freedoms and human rights contained in key AU policy standards and legal instruments. We work with social movements, CSOs and their coalitions and alliances, the African Union (AU), Regional economic blocks (RECs) and Governments to influence, popularise and implement key international and continental policy standards, pledges and human rights instruments. Our Strategic Framework 2010-2013 works towards the national implementation of these policy intentions and the protection of the rights and freedoms that they exemplify.
Consistent with our Oxfam southern campaigning principles, we also recognise that the primary agency for change in Africa lies in Africa and with African organisations. To this end, we will support a strong and autonomous pan Africa campaigning force of pan African coalitions, alliances and social movements to articulate their change objectives and work closely with their own members and partners at various levels.
What change is Oxfam Pan Africa aim to bring about?
Poverty and suffering in Africa is the consequence of unequal power relations between Africa and the global political-economy as well as the denial by African States of citizen's economic, social and human rights and fundamental freedoms. Four centuries of trans-continental slavery, a century of colonialism and two decades of Structural Adjustment Programmes (SAPs) have produced common challenges for Africa. The failure of global policy institutions to stop the over-exploitation of African resources, commodity price-fixing of Africa's resources by industrialised countries, capital flight and the global under-representation of Africa in institutions such as the United Nations and the International Finance Institutions have undermined Africa's capacity to achieve economic independence and a greater share of the world market. Oxfam believes that assertive representation of both African state and non-state actors in these global spaces is critical. Oxfam believes that a strong and dynamic civil society is a precondition for pro-poor change in Africa. Inequality, exclusion and marginalisation are the consequence of the failure of the African state to regulate the distribution of sub-soil assets and other natural resources, financial capital and markets in a fair and responsible manner. Consequently, the majority of African men, women and children remain marginalised by their lack of voice, visibility and informed participation in setting the public policy agenda and holding political elites accountable. In 2010-2013, Oxfam sought to enable, strengthen and accompany more than thirty Pan African coalitions, alliances and social movements to realise fundamental freedoms and basic human rights in three primary areas: gender justice, economic justice and democratic governance. We do this by supporting a strong and autonomous pan African campaigning force of coalitions, alliances and social movements from four offices located in Addis Ababa, Dakar, Nairobi and Den Haag, with support from the Oxfam presence in South Africa and other country offices in Africa. A joint governance and management system guides the participating affiliates.
Expected outcomes per strategy pillar by 2013
Democratic Governance – Outcomes by 2013:AU adopts internal compliance accountability system.Pan African Parliament holds States accountable for delivery.African social movements supported to learn from their experiences.Coalitions/Movements supported to utilise appropriate new media where appropriate.Economic Justice – Outcomes by 2013:More countries reach agriculture 10% targetPolicymakers more responsive to interests of small scale farmers.More visible & vocal participation of farmers, esp. women.Alternative policy options to “agro-colonialism” (wide-scale leasing of land to foreigners.More countries adopt national climate adaptation plans.Global agreement reached to cut emissions, fund adaptation and mitigation.Gender Justice – Outcomes by 2013:More Governments ratify and implement the Women’s Rights Protocol.[Peace & Security Council decisions influenced by women in conflict.]More Governments adopt gender aware budgeting.Greater number of women supported in public leadership.Capacity Building – Outcomes by 2013:AU more responsive and accountable to positions of allies, rights-holders and Oxfam International.More coherent and assertive claims made by the AU in the global policy arena.African States to domesticate and implement key standards and treaties.[Capacity building for key Coalitions and NGOs on various advocacy areas.][Engage the Peace and Security Council of the AU on OI RIC priorities.]2. Objectives of the EvaluationThe overall objective of the evaluation is to assess the performance as per planned outcomes, document lessons learnt in the implementation of the Pan Africa Strategic Framework (PAF) since 2010 and suggest key elements for a new phase of the programme. Specifically the evaluation will assess issues related to relevance, effectiveness, efficiency and will come up with orientations and recommendations for successful implementation of a further phase.
The specific evaluation issues to focus on are:Assess whether the analysis, theory of change, objectives and outcomes of the programme were and still are relevant, appropriate and realisticEvaluate whether Oxfam adequately adapted the implementation of the Framework to context changes in 2010-2013Assess the coherence of activities in relation to outputs and the latter in relation to outcomesEstablish the status of progress and achievements for the period by comparing actual and expected outcomes, including unintended outcomes (evidence based quantitative and qualitative findings), as well as the sustainability of theseDetermine what policy and practice changes have occurred and how they have contributed to the achievement of the outcomesAscertain how policy changes at pan Africa level translated into change at national levelAssess the status, influence and sustainability of civil society coalitions/social movements which Oxfam has supported through its PAFAscertain to which extent the PAF contributed to Oxfam campaigns, and how this has been appreciated.What are the possibilities for enhanced linking of local-regional-global programming and campaigning?Analyse the effectiveness of the information system in relation to achievements and documentation of lesson learntAssess cost efficiency of outcomes achievedAssess the strengths and weaknesses and any constraints in the implementation of the programmeAppreciate how the program contributed to gender empowerment and furthering gender equality Document lessons learnt, gaps and possible catalytic effects of actions implemented; as well as the effectiveness of the intervention strategiesMake strategic and operational recommendations for the new phase of programme
The external assessment will be carried out by (an) external consultant(s). Qualitative information gathering methods will be applied.The detailed methodology shall be proposed by the consultant(s) in consultation with Oxfam. Nevertheless, the minimum methodological steps to include are: Documentation review. This includes but not limited, program documents, annual reports, annual work plans and budgets, internal review reports, researches and policy briefs, position papers, advocacy material and communication strategies, specific notes and any external written feedback, publications, media statements, blogs, etc.… Semi structured or/and structured interviews with different stakeholders (face-to-face, by emails or by teleconference. This will include but not limited to: Oxfam staff: Pan Africa team; managers/country directors, programme officers, technical focal persons in OGB and ONL Headquarters and Oxfam country offices (at least 2 from each African region); other relevant staff including the Regional Directors, Institutional Funding Units, Campaign Teams (incl. RiC staff, GROW), etc.Partner organisations: relevant person in national and regional farmers and women’s rights networks; pan African, regional and national CSO organisations engaged in one of the four pillars of the Strategic Framework; etc. Like minded organisations Institutions we seek to influence: relevant representatives of African Union bodies, Africa Development Bank, Regional Economic Blocs, National Governments, etc. Donor community: DfID (UK), DGIS (Netherlands), SIDA (Sweden) and so on Survey/Questionnaire to consult partners and key stakeholders. Impact assessment.Country visits to one Oxfam programme each in West Africa, Southern Africa and the Horn, East and Central Africa (HECA); including visits to PAF-partners present in-country, where relevant. The methodology will include non formal feedback sessions to be done to the Reference Committee and will be organised at midterm and end of the assignment. After production of the draft report a formal restitution session will be organised with the participation of Oxfam Pan Africa staff (and representation of regional/country directors if possible).
A detailed external assessment methodology will be submitted by the consultant(s) and discussed with the evaluation committee. The proposed methodology will be gender sensitive and will include justification of methodological choices.
4. Evaluation Report and Related Products
The consultant(s) will produce and submit a quality report to the Reference Committee for the evaluation of the Oxfam Pan Africa Framework 2010-2013.
The report will have a maximum of 30 pages (excluding annexes). This report, written in English will be primary used by Oxfam, and will be shared when necessary with its donors and partners.
The evaluation report will contains at least the following elements:Executive summary, including the major findings of the evaluation and summary conclusions and recommendationsObjectives of the evaluationOutline of the methodology and its justificationLimitations of the evaluation if anyPresentation of the analysis and findings, including unexpected relevant findingsRecommendations Conclusions(Interview/Questionnaire) Reports and appendices5. Desired profile consultant(s)
The consultant(s) should have:Masters Degree in a relevant field (minimum)Specialised in international and/or social developmentAt least 5 years of consultancy experience on evaluating advocacy and campaigning programmesDemonstrated experience with focus on gender, social transformation and conflict managementExperience in programme evaluation with proven analytical skills is requiredProficiency in two of the three working languages (English, French and Portuguese) is highly desired6. Time-frame for the Evaluation
The evaluation should last a maximum of 1 month, starting from September 24th. A daily rate will be agreed with the consultant(s) for a maximum of 25 days, and according to the Oxfam standards of consultancy.
The draft report should be submitted to the Reference Committee on Sunday October 22th. A feedback session will be organised with the Reference Committee and representatives of Regional/Country Directors thereafter. A final report should be submitted to the Reference Committee by October 26th 2012 at the latest.
Logistics and payment modalities will be included in the contract agreement.
7. Deadline for Consultancy Applications
Interested applicants should submit their CVs and Technical Proposal by 24:00hrs GMT on Sunday 9th September.
Submissions can be sent to vacancy@oxfamnovib.or.ke indicating reference code “PAFEVAL”.A follow up discussion on the technical proposal, including interpretation of the terms of reference, data collection methods and tools, together with a detailed chronogram will be organised with the selected consultant(s) mid-September.
For questions related to the consultancy please contact Monique van Es, co-manager Pan Africa Framework, on Monique.van.Es@oxfamnovib.nl
Aug 10, 2012
Terms of Reference for Training on Project Management
Project Site: Muthaiga, Nairobi
2.0 Background
The project being funded by Terre des Hommes-Netherlands is coming to a close on the 31st August 2012. However, with prospects for more funding WRAP having submitted various proposals to various donors, the organization intends to build staff capacity on project management to help the project team improve their skills to formulate, deliver, monitor and evaluate the projects.
In this regard, WRAP is seeking a qualified individual/organization to carry out trainings on Project Management. The training is expected to take place between 22nd and 24th August 2012 at WRAP offices.
The scope of this assignment comprises the following:Develop a three (3) day training programme, under a close consultation with WRAP team. Provide a detailed training on project management; project life cycle – Project planning, monitoring and evaluation. Environmental impact assessment; PESTLE analysis, SWOT analysis and strategy implementation, monitoring and evaluation.Fund raising strategies/Income generating activities and Project proposal writing.
The training is planned to take place between 22nd and 24th August 2012 i.e. the number of working of this assignment is three (3) working days.
The costed proposal, including the training provider’s resume should reach the undersigned not later than August 15th 2012.
1.0 Introduction
Title: Project Planning and Management Training
Project Site: Muthaiga, Nairobi
2.0 Background
WRAP’s mission statement: “WRAP is a national non-governmental, non-profit-making, human rights organization that creates awareness on and advocates for the rights of women and children and addresses the needs of violated and abused women and children by providing shelter and other related supportive services in Kenya.”
The project being funded by Terre des Hommes-Netherlands is coming to a close on the 31st August 2012. However, with prospects for more funding WRAP having submitted various proposals to various donors, the organization intends to build staff capacity on project management to help the project team improve their skills to formulate, deliver, monitor and evaluate the projects.
In this regard, WRAP is seeking a qualified individual/organization to carry out trainings on Project Management. The training is expected to take place between 22nd and 24th August 2012 at WRAP offices.
3.0 Objectives of the Assignment
The scope of this assignment comprises the following:Develop a three (3) day training programme, under a close consultation with WRAP team. Provide a detailed training on project management; project life cycle – Project planning, monitoring and evaluation. Environmental impact assessment; PESTLE analysis, SWOT analysis and strategy implementation, monitoring and evaluation.Fund raising strategies/Income generating activities and Project proposal writing.
The training is planned to take place between 22nd and 24th August 2012 i.e. the number of working of this assignment is three (3) working days.
6.0 Qualifications
Strong understanding of project planning and management and at least five (5) years experience’ consultancies working with groups both local and international contextsSound understanding of children and women’s rightsGood analytical and critical skillsExtensive experience and expertise in-group facilitation.7.0 Deadline for Receiving ProposalThe costed proposal, including the training provider’s resume should reach the undersigned not later than August 15th 2012.
The Director
Women’s Rights Awareness Programme (WRAP)
P.O Box 3006 – 00200, Nairobi, Kenya
Tel. 0721-367677, 0722-252939
Email: info@wrapkenya.or.ke
Jul 22, 2012
East Africa Drought Appeal
FINAL EVALUATION
TERMS OF REFERENCE
Introduction In 2011, the region of East Africa experienced the most profound drought conditions in 60 years, causing the world’s most serious food emergency. According to UN reports an estimated 12.4 million people were severely affected across the region including in Kenya, Somalia, Ethiopia, South Sudan. Despite a strong international response, the situation continued to deteriorate, and there was no likelihood of real improvements until 2012, and then only if rains and crops were sufficient.Failed rains, or rainfall below normal levels, and recurrent droughts in recent years, have made it a battle for many households to maintain their livestock and agricultural holdings. Many have become destitute and moved to urban centres in the hope of finding casual labour opportunities. Many households have also become increasingly dependent on limited humanitarian aid, remittances from the Diaspora and on internal social supports. However, all these safety nets are drastically weakened as the world economy deteriorates and food prices increase.
In response to this crisis, on July the 6th 2011, the Humanitarian Coalition launched an appeal to the Canadian public for funds to enable its member agencies to scale up the humanitarian response across 3 countries, Kenya, Somalia and Ethiopia. The total raised by the appeal stands at $14 million; $7 million by the Humanitarian Coalition and rest by the member agencies.
HC Member Agency Programs
All 5 Humanitarian Coalition Member Agencies had existing programs in the region and responded in this appeal. Three agencies are using HC funds in Kenya, two in Ethiopia and two in Somalia. The totality of HC funds are expected to be used by September 2012.
Further details of HC Member Agency programs and funding will be made available to the consultants on signing the Contract of Agreement with the HC.
Objectives of the Final Evaluation2.1. To evaluate the overall impact of member interventions. 2.2. To confirm findings of the RTE conducted jointly with the Disasters Emergency Committee in October-November 2011 and to evaluate to what extent lessons or recommendations from the RTE have been taken into account and applied to programming.
2.3 To evaluate gender dynamics of program impacts and hoe gender was factored in all areas of the crisis response. Gender will serve as a cross-cutting theme in the evaluation methodology and findings.
2.4 To document a comparative analysis of best practices in cash-transfer programming in affected communities. This element of the evaluation will be documented as a separate (stand-alone) annex to the evaluation findings.
Timing and Resources
The field mission should take place in ¬¬¬¬¬¬September-October 2012. Up to 5 days may be taken prior to departure for the review of agency plans and to make contact with Members’ head offices. The field mission should be a maximum of 12 days duration in each country. A further week after the field mission may be taken for report writing. Time should be allowed for a workshop in the Canada after the first draft of the report has been prepared – to be completed within 3 weeks of the end of the field mission.
Risks and Challenges
Efforts will be required to manage the following:
• Timing of this evaluation may present challenges in accessing people that were present in the earlier response. • Holidays in Ethiopia in September will require work around. • Multiple countries will lead to logistical challenges and duplicated costs, these should be managed carefully to ensure all mission objectives and budget guidelines are met. • Possibility of creating undue expectations among beneficiaries that participate in focus groups for projects that are now completed. • Security situation in program areas in Kenya may significantly impact access to beneficiaries.
Field Coordination
One HC Member Agency will be identified as ‘Host Agency’ in Ethiopia and Kenya (may be separate organisations in each country). They will be responsible for helping to Coordinate the field mission, offer appropriate logistical support and be able to answer the consultants’ questions. HC Members, where appropriate, will ensure that key partner agencies meet the consultants and ensure the work funded by HC or CIDA is open for scrutiny.
The host agency will organise two meetings of the HC Agencies [and/or partners] in Ethiopia/Kenya; one at the start of the mission and one at the conclusion, to feedback findings. The first meeting will enable the Consultant/s to facilitate a review exercise; enable discussion on the cumulative coverage and impact of the HC members’ response; and on the specific issues outlined above. In addition to providing feedback, the final meeting could be used to identify any program, policy, or advocacy issues that need attention and determine whether agencies are willing and able to take them forward.
COVERAGE
Consultants should be prepared travel within the countries in order to cover as many agencies’ programs as possible. Each agency’s program should be visited in at least one country.
6. Other Coordination
The HC Secretariat will:
? Indentify a host agency to provide field coordination in Kenya and Ethiopia ? Compile contact information in Canada and Kenya/Ethiopia for each agency ? Make available Member Agency program plans and budgets, as well as any internal Member Agency evaluation findings
The consultant/s will arrange own visa, insurance and travel to the area.
It is possible that one member of HC Secretariat Staff will accompany the consultant team in each country.
Report The Consultant/s will be responsible for delivery of a draft report and Executive summary written in English and submitted 10 days following return from the field. This will be shared with Member Agencies and a meeting of representatives set up at the HC office in Ottawa with the consultant/s to discuss the findings prior to finalisation of the text.The report must be confined to the specific objectives of the mission and should not be more than 25 pages, including an executive summary and map of the Members operations but excluding appendices. One appendix will present the analysis of best practices in cash transfer programming. The executive summary should include a brief narrative overview of what members have achieved as well as highlighting any issues of concern.
It is the intention of the HC that the report will be published, with the HC assuming lead responsibility for this. The final version of the report will be translated into French.
Individual agency-specific reports providing commentary on individual agencies’ performance are also expected. These will be shared with the HC Secretariat and the respective agencies only. The decision to include these in the final public report will be made by the HC.
Recommendations should be based on empirical evidence gathered during the course of the mission, prioritised and limited to 10 key points. This mission is not a commentary on the overall international relief effort, but a timely snapshot of the efforts and behaviours of HC members. The report should avoid generalisations or speculation as to the possible role of the HC in current or future emergencies. If other issues do arise, discussion with the Secretariat will determine how they should be addressed.
The Evaluation findings are those of the author/s and will be made available to the Members as such. Any communication on the findings will make it clear that the report reflects the opinions of the authors alone and not the HC Secretariat or their Members. It is intended that the report will be made available on the HC and ALNAP websites.
Jul 14, 2012
Terms of Reference for Evaluation of Comprehensive RBM Capacity Building for HIV AIDS Service Organizations (RECABASO) projectThe Regional AIDS Training Network (RATN), based in Nairobi Kenya, is a regional NGO with presence in eleven countries across Eastern and Southern Africa. RATN’s mission is to strengthen the capacity of individuals and organizations to respond to HIV and AIDS. Currently RATN has 35 member institutions In 11 countries.
The Comprehensive RBM Capacity Building for HIV AIDS Service Organizations (RECABASO) project is a new and innovative initiative, aimed at utilizing best practices in identifying and addressing Results Based Management capacity gaps among organizations implementing HIV & AIDS programmes in Eastern and Southern Africa.
The RECABASO project strives to reinforce the role played by Results Based Management in improving the effectiveness of HIV and AIDS programmes. The project approach stresses that adequate capacity building and technical support is necessary in helping many AIDS Service Organizations (ASOs0 realize their potential. In this context RATN with funding from Sida launched the RECABASO initiative aimed at building RBM capacity for AIDS service organizations and community institutions implementing programmes towards achieving the public health Millennium Development Goals 4, 5, and 6 which are; to reduce child mortality rate; improve maternal health and combat HIV and AIDS, malaria, and other diseases
In Eastern Africa, the project is implemented by Regional AIDS Training Network in partnership with Eastern Africa Networks of AIDS Service Organizations (EANNASO), based in Arusha, Tanzania.
The project involves AIDS service organizations and community institutions indicating specific RBM areas in which they need capacity building and how the need is linked to improved HIV services delivery. RECABASO teams of RBM experts then follow up with detailed diagnosis of applicant organizations to line up with the best solutions that include experiential learning, internships, on-site mentoring and technical support and follow-ups.
RATN is seeking a competent and experienced consultant for evaluation of RECABASO project. The overall purpose of this consultancy is to assess the implementation and outcomes of the pilot phase of RECABASO that run from January 2011 to April 30, 2012.
The specific objectives of the assessment are to:
a) Assess the extent to which the project objectives have been achieved
b) Review the current status of the beneficiary institutions including any follow up plans;
c) Document successes, challenges and lessons learnt during the course of implementation and
d) Make recommendations on how best to enhance and implement the next phase of RECABASO
2. Scope of Work for the AssignmentIn undertaking the evaluation the consultant will focus on the following aspects but not limited to:
Programme Conceptualization/Design:
i. Assess whether the problems the project was addressing were clearly identified and the approach soundly conceived;
ii. Assess whether the target beneficiaries and end-users of the results of the project were clearly identified;
i. Assess whether the project was relevant to the development priorities of the country and;
ii. Given the objectives of the project, whether appropriate institutions have been assisted.
The consultant shall examine the quality and/or timeliness in regard to:
i. The delivery of inputs specified in the project document, including institutional arrangements, interest of beneficiaries, the scheduling and actual implementation
ii. Assess whether the management arrangements of the project were appropriate and adequate;
iii. The responsiveness of the project management to significant changes in the environment in which the project functioned (both facilitating or impeding project implementation);
i. Assess whether the project resources (financial, physical and manpower) were adequate in terms of both quantity and quality;
ii. Assess whether the project resources were used effectively to produce planned results Assess whether the project is cost-effective compared to similar interventions;
iii. The role of the project Steering Team (RATN and EANNASO) and its impact (positive and negative) on the functioning of the programme.
Results/Success of the programme:
The overall outputs and their meaning are as defined in project documents that should form the main basis for this evaluation. In addition to the targets in the logical framework, the details of the specific project outcomes to be provided are:
i. What are the major achievements of the project vis-Ã -vis its objectives.
ii. What are the potential areas for programme success? Please explain in detail in terms of impact, sustainability of results and contribution to capacity development.
iii. What major issues and problems affected the implementation of the project and what factors could have resolved them.
iv. Given an opportunity, what actions the consultant would have recommended to ensure that this potential for success translated into actual success.
v. Level of institutional networking achieved and capacity development of key partners, if done in a structured manner at different stages – from inception to programme operations.
vi. Any underlying factors, beyond control, that influenced the outcome of the programme.
vii. Have there been any unplanned effects
Summary of recommendations and lessons learnt
i. Provide detailed recommendations on main issues associated with the design, planning, results, outcomes, management and implementation of the RECABASO project. The information provided should enable the RATN management to determine what needs to be improved to ensure that the project achieves its intended purpose and impact.
ii. The Review Report shall also include recommendations, if necessary, for the implementing ASOs to improve the quality of similar projects with an understanding that the feedback of these recommendations to the ASOs will assist them to improve the subsequent RECABASO project
3. Expected Deliverables and Schedule
To complete the assignment the consultant shall submit on the following deliverables:Draft evaluation report: In line with the purpose of the consultancy above, the consultant shall be responsible for producing a report covering in detail each of the specific objectives above. The Consultant will present a draft report 15 work-days after commencement of the contract.Final evaluation Report: The final evaluation report will be submitted five (5) days after receiving written feedback from the RATN Management and stakeholders.The eligible consultant should demonstrate the following:Proven experience in evaluating similar programmesGood conceptual understanding of RBM and institutional capacity building issues relating to HIV and AIDSA proven record of accomplishing tasks such as this on timeFluency in EnglishExcellent soft skillsA total of 20 days will be assigned to the consultant. It is estimated that 3 days will be used for preparing for the assignment and inception report, 12 days data collection and 5 days for preparing the evaluation report and subsequent revisions.
Those wishing to be considered for this consultancy should submit the following documents in English to RECABASO Coordinator by email: RECABASO@ratn.org with a copy to ratn@ratn.org, not later than July 16, 2012.2. A brief description of the methods that will be used conduct the evaluation
4. Three references of previous evaluation workEmail subject line should be: RECABASO Evaluation
The Comprehensive RBM Capacity Building for HIV AIDS Service Organizations (RECABASO) project is a new and innovative initiative, aimed at utilizing best practices in identifying and addressing Results Based Management capacity gaps among organizations implementing HIV & AIDS programmes in Eastern and Southern Africa.
The RECABASO project strives to reinforce the role played by Results Based Management in improving the effectiveness of HIV and AIDS programmes. The project approach stresses that adequate capacity building and technical support is necessary in helping many AIDS Service Organizations (ASOs0 realize their potential. In this context RATN with funding from Sida launched the RECABASO initiative aimed at building RBM capacity for AIDS service organizations and community institutions implementing programmes towards achieving the public health Millennium Development Goals 4, 5, and 6 which are; to reduce child mortality rate; improve maternal health and combat HIV and AIDS, malaria, and other diseases
In Eastern Africa, the project is implemented by Regional AIDS Training Network in partnership with Eastern Africa Networks of AIDS Service Organizations (EANNASO), based in Arusha, Tanzania.
The project involves AIDS service organizations and community institutions indicating specific RBM areas in which they need capacity building and how the need is linked to improved HIV services delivery. RECABASO teams of RBM experts then follow up with detailed diagnosis of applicant organizations to line up with the best solutions that include experiential learning, internships, on-site mentoring and technical support and follow-ups.
RATN is seeking a competent and experienced consultant for evaluation of RECABASO project. The overall purpose of this consultancy is to assess the implementation and outcomes of the pilot phase of RECABASO that run from January 2011 to April 30, 2012.
The specific objectives of the assessment are to:
a) Assess the extent to which the project objectives have been achieved
b) Review the current status of the beneficiary institutions including any follow up plans;
c) Document successes, challenges and lessons learnt during the course of implementation and
d) Make recommendations on how best to enhance and implement the next phase of RECABASO
2. Scope of Work for the AssignmentIn undertaking the evaluation the consultant will focus on the following aspects but not limited to:
Programme Conceptualization/Design:
i. Assess whether the problems the project was addressing were clearly identified and the approach soundly conceived;
ii. Assess whether the target beneficiaries and end-users of the results of the project were clearly identified;
i. Assess whether the project was relevant to the development priorities of the country and;
ii. Given the objectives of the project, whether appropriate institutions have been assisted.
The consultant shall examine the quality and/or timeliness in regard to:
i. The delivery of inputs specified in the project document, including institutional arrangements, interest of beneficiaries, the scheduling and actual implementation
ii. Assess whether the management arrangements of the project were appropriate and adequate;
iii. The responsiveness of the project management to significant changes in the environment in which the project functioned (both facilitating or impeding project implementation);
i. Assess whether the project resources (financial, physical and manpower) were adequate in terms of both quantity and quality;
ii. Assess whether the project resources were used effectively to produce planned results Assess whether the project is cost-effective compared to similar interventions;
iii. The role of the project Steering Team (RATN and EANNASO) and its impact (positive and negative) on the functioning of the programme.
Results/Success of the programme:
The overall outputs and their meaning are as defined in project documents that should form the main basis for this evaluation. In addition to the targets in the logical framework, the details of the specific project outcomes to be provided are:
i. What are the major achievements of the project vis-Ã -vis its objectives.
ii. What are the potential areas for programme success? Please explain in detail in terms of impact, sustainability of results and contribution to capacity development.
iii. What major issues and problems affected the implementation of the project and what factors could have resolved them.
iv. Given an opportunity, what actions the consultant would have recommended to ensure that this potential for success translated into actual success.
v. Level of institutional networking achieved and capacity development of key partners, if done in a structured manner at different stages – from inception to programme operations.
vi. Any underlying factors, beyond control, that influenced the outcome of the programme.
vii. Have there been any unplanned effects
Summary of recommendations and lessons learnt
i. Provide detailed recommendations on main issues associated with the design, planning, results, outcomes, management and implementation of the RECABASO project. The information provided should enable the RATN management to determine what needs to be improved to ensure that the project achieves its intended purpose and impact.
ii. The Review Report shall also include recommendations, if necessary, for the implementing ASOs to improve the quality of similar projects with an understanding that the feedback of these recommendations to the ASOs will assist them to improve the subsequent RECABASO project
3. Expected Deliverables and Schedule
To complete the assignment the consultant shall submit on the following deliverables:Draft evaluation report: In line with the purpose of the consultancy above, the consultant shall be responsible for producing a report covering in detail each of the specific objectives above. The Consultant will present a draft report 15 work-days after commencement of the contract.Final evaluation Report: The final evaluation report will be submitted five (5) days after receiving written feedback from the RATN Management and stakeholders.The eligible consultant should demonstrate the following:Proven experience in evaluating similar programmesGood conceptual understanding of RBM and institutional capacity building issues relating to HIV and AIDSA proven record of accomplishing tasks such as this on timeFluency in EnglishExcellent soft skillsA total of 20 days will be assigned to the consultant. It is estimated that 3 days will be used for preparing for the assignment and inception report, 12 days data collection and 5 days for preparing the evaluation report and subsequent revisions.
Those wishing to be considered for this consultancy should submit the following documents in English to RECABASO Coordinator by email: RECABASO@ratn.org with a copy to ratn@ratn.org, not later than July 16, 2012.2. A brief description of the methods that will be used conduct the evaluation
4. Three references of previous evaluation workEmail subject line should be: RECABASO Evaluation
Jul 4, 2012
Survey period: August 2012 (Specific dates to be confirmed)
Programme / Project title: Integrated Emergency Health, Nutrition and WASH Programme
Medair intends to commission a survey to determine the coverage of the OTP/SFP programme in Burao, South Togdheer, El Efweyne and Cynabo using the CSAS or SQUEAC methodology
To map out both point and period coverage for the targeted areas.Identify factors affecting the uptake of OTP/SFP services in Medair targetedDevelop in collaboration with Medair, WFP and UNICEF, specific recommendations to improve the uptake of OTP/SFP programmes.Transfer knowledge and skill about the chosen methodology to Medair’s nutrition team.Arrange in coordination with Medair, the staff and material needed for the surveyEnsure all ethical and other survey clearance has been obtained from responsible officesTrain data collectors with the key emphasis on achieving quality and genuine dataCoordinate and lead the survey team throughout the surveyEnsure data quality while in the field and during data entry and analysisResponsible for data cleaning, coding, preliminary and final reportFull report on coverage survey of nutrition intervention (OTP and SFP) for Burao, South Togdheer, Cynabo and El Efweyne districtsCoverage survey power-point presentation (10-15 slides)Survey data base on completion of final reportThe consultant must hold a Bachelor of Nutrition or Masters in Public Health and have had previous experience in conducting Nutrition Coverage Surveys using SQUEAC Methodology. Ability to train people with basic education will be highly valued.
Duration of the consultancy will be up to 5 weeks (4 weeks preparation and data collection and 1 week data analysis and reporting).
Expressions of interest are invited from interested consultants. The EOI should detail how the consultant is able to meet the ToR and be sent to health-som@medair.org latest Wednesday 11 July 2012.
Programme / Project title: Integrated Emergency Health, Nutrition and WASH Programme
Medair intends to commission a survey to determine the coverage of the OTP/SFP programme in Burao, South Togdheer, El Efweyne and Cynabo using the CSAS or SQUEAC methodology
To map out both point and period coverage for the targeted areas.Identify factors affecting the uptake of OTP/SFP services in Medair targetedDevelop in collaboration with Medair, WFP and UNICEF, specific recommendations to improve the uptake of OTP/SFP programmes.Transfer knowledge and skill about the chosen methodology to Medair’s nutrition team.Arrange in coordination with Medair, the staff and material needed for the surveyEnsure all ethical and other survey clearance has been obtained from responsible officesTrain data collectors with the key emphasis on achieving quality and genuine dataCoordinate and lead the survey team throughout the surveyEnsure data quality while in the field and during data entry and analysisResponsible for data cleaning, coding, preliminary and final reportFull report on coverage survey of nutrition intervention (OTP and SFP) for Burao, South Togdheer, Cynabo and El Efweyne districtsCoverage survey power-point presentation (10-15 slides)Survey data base on completion of final reportThe consultant must hold a Bachelor of Nutrition or Masters in Public Health and have had previous experience in conducting Nutrition Coverage Surveys using SQUEAC Methodology. Ability to train people with basic education will be highly valued.
Duration of the consultancy will be up to 5 weeks (4 weeks preparation and data collection and 1 week data analysis and reporting).
Expressions of interest are invited from interested consultants. The EOI should detail how the consultant is able to meet the ToR and be sent to health-som@medair.org latest Wednesday 11 July 2012.
